June 15, 2010

A Day to Remember: The Burning of the General Slocum

The PS General Slocum
By Niccolò Graffio
Anyone who’s been reading the articles I write for this blog knows that I am a Sicilian* and am quite proud of that fact. My people have a long and rich history filled with fascinating people and events that deserves to be retold and discussed. Though the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was invaded and destroyed by its enemies in 1861, its children, scattered across the globe, still contribute to this wonderful thing we call Western Civilization, even if we no longer have a homeland to call our own.

However, I am also an American, born and raised in the City of New York and am equally proud of both of those facts, as well. Why shouldn’t I be? America, economically and militarily, is still the preeminent power in the world. New York City is the economic hub of America. Just as the Christian theologian Saul Paulus of Tarsus (aka the Apostle Paul) was proud to call himself a Roman citizen, so am I proud to call myself an American one.

Some might accuse me of being a “hyphenated American” or worse, a dual loyalist, saying it is impossible to share love and loyalty with two homelands. I find such a sentiment laughable! Do we not as human beings share our love and loyalty with both our parents (if we’re lucky enough to have two parents, anyway)? I have always thought of i Due Sicilie as my fatherland, because the seed which produced me sprang from there. Likewise, I have always felt America was my motherland because I was raised and nurtured here.

Make no mistake about it; I was born and raised in these United States of America, and I intend to die and be buried here! Yet I shall also always have a place in my heart for members of my ethnos and the lands from which they sprang. Call it tribalism, ethnocentrism, or anything else you wish; that’s just the way it is, with no apologies to anyone, including narrow-minded nativists.

To date I have written exclusively about the trials and travails of my people, the Sicilians*, both here and abroad. This is hardly surprising; given the fact this is an ethno-cultural blog. Yet if the expatriates of i Due Sicilie are my brethren, are not Americans my fellow citizens? I do not intend to go off on a tangent and start writing about American history; there are plenty of other blogs that engage in that activity, for those interested in such a topic.

Yet sitting here, staring at my calendar, I am reminded of the imminent approach of a somber date in the history of the City of New York. An anniversary of a tragedy, a horror in fact, that took the lives of over a thousand innocent New Yorkers. It is to them, my fellow New Yorkers, that I dedicate this article.

From its inception America was intended to be a place for European expatriates, wishing to escape authoritarian regimes on the other side of “the Big Pond”, to settle (read the Immigration Act of 1790 and its revision in 1795 if you don’t believe me). In the beginning the bulk of those who chose to come were mainly from northwestern and central Europe. In time, however, others joined them for a variety of reasons.

Large numbers of Germans began immigrating to what is now America as early as the 1680s. The Colony of Pennsylvania was the favored destination of these early settlers. Its rolling hills, dense, deciduous forests, mild summers and snowy winters undoubtedly reminded them of Deutschland.

Though it is long-forgotten by most Americans living today, these early German immigrants were hardly greeted with open arms by many native-born Americans of the time. Differences in language, culture and religion caused many to speak out (or worse) against incoming Germans. No less than Benjamin Franklin wrote these words:
“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.“
In spite of this bigotry, the Germans continued to stream into the colonies. Sadly, many of them were poor and forced to sell themselves as indentured servants in order to raise the passage fare to get here. The ships that brought them were crowded, filthy and often disease-ridden. The mortality rates from such ‘niceties’ as epidemic typhus, especially among children, were horrid!

Once here, they were often abused by their “employers” as indentured servants had few if any rights. In fact, indentured servants were typically treated worse than black slaves because unlike indentured servants, slaves were chattel property. The mindset of many plantation owners was undoubtedly: “Why risk an expensive slave when a dumb immigrant will do?

The bulk of these German immigrants passed through the City of New York on their way to the American Dream. Though most eventually settled elsewhere, a goodly number of them remained in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, forming a tightly knit community of German immigrants known affectionately as Kleindeutschland (German: “Little Germany”). Non-German inhabitants of New York City erroneously referred to it as “Dutchtown.”

As New York City grew, so did Kleindeutschland. Between 1845-55 its population more than quadrupled. By the beginning of the 20th century it was home to more than 50,000 people, almost all of whom were German. Though many if not most of these people went on to become American citizens, they were by no means in any hurry to assimilate (i.e. lose their ethno-cultural heritage). There were German shops, German factories, German language newspapers, German-style beer gardens (!), German theatres, German churches and synagogues. A person in Germany rendered comatose and who woke up in the middle of Kleindeutschland might be tempted to think they were still somewhere in Germany!

As one might expect to happen in an area such as this, the older families had become more settled and established by the turn of the century. Some of them had even achieved a fair degree of opulence!

Such a vibrant and colorful community could have and should have continued well into the 20th century (and beyond); a totally avoidable disaster, however, sealed its fate.

St. Mark’s Lutheran Evangelical Church (founded 1848) was located at what is now 323 East 6th Street in downtown Manhattan. It was the parish of choice for many of “Little Germany’s” finest citizens. Starting in 1887 and for ever year after that, the church would organize a community picnic to commemorate the end of the school year. For the year 1904 the church had decided to rent (for $350) a wooden paddle steamer, the PS General Slocum, as it had done every year previously, for its outing.

The General Slocum was 235 ft. long, 37.5 ft. wide, and had three decks. It had a crew of 23 including its captain, one William H. Van Schaick and two pilots. Captain Van Schaick was 68-y.o.with years of experience under his belt. He had recently been giving a citation for having ferried millions with an unblemished sailing record.

The day’s outing would be as follows: the ship would depart north along the East River for a tour of Manhattan, then turn east and continue sailing along the Long Island Sound before finally arriving at Locust Grove in Eatons Neck, Long Island for the day’s picnic.

On June 15th, 1904 the Slocum set sail with at 9:30 AM with some 1,358 passengers, most of whom were women and children. In addition to refreshments, a live band was onboard to provide entertainment. All indications were this day was to be a joyous one!

Around 10 AM, the PS General Slocum began to die.

The fire began in the Lamp Room in the forward section, probably by a discarded cigarette or match. That would have probably been nothing in and of itself, but for the fact the room was a mess of discarded straw, oily rags and lamp oil. The fire spread quickly to a paint locker filled with flammable liquids and a cabin room filled with gasoline. By this time the fire had evolved into a full-fledged conflagration!

Even at this time, most of the people on the ship were still unaware of their impending doom. Witnesses on shore stated that while they could plainly see the smoke and fire, the band onboard was still playing.

One of the first people on the Slocum to notice the fire was 12-y.o. Frank Prawdzicki, who ran to the pilot house to try to warn the captain. Instead, he was told: “Get the hell out of here!” He and his mother survived, but his four sisters perished.

When the crew finally realized what was happening it was still another ten minutes before they notified the captain. A number of other factors had a hand in the monstrous death toll. The Knickerbocker Steamship Company, which owned the General Slocum, had allowed the safety equipment to rot, never replacing a thing. Fire hoses and life preservers crumbled to the touch. Life boats were either tied up, or some claim were wired and painted in place! Incredibly, the crew had never been given fire drills!

In addition, most of the passengers were unable to swim. Given the fact beach-going was still a rarity in those days, this was hardly unusual.

Finally, in what could only be described as a moment of monumental stupidity, Captain Van Schaick, instead of ordering the ship immediately beached along the shores of the East River, commanded that it stay its course! By continuing into the headwinds, he actually fanned the flames, helping them to consume the ship.

Numerous people threw themselves into the waters of the East River in a desperate attempt to escape the fire. Unfortunately, the weighted dresses of females at that time dragged down even those who knew how to swim. Many people put aged life preservers around their children, threw them into water, then watched in horror as the preservers crumbled and their children sank!

Before the ship reached North Brother Island, just south of the Bronx shore, the scene became one of gore. Hundreds perished when the overloaded decks of the ship collapsed. Still others were literally torn apart by the Slocum’s still-turning paddles as they tried to escape into the water or over the sides of the vessel.

By the time the ship reached the island it is estimated 1,021 people were dead from fire or drowning, including two crew members. Numerous acts of heroism occurred among passengers, witnesses and emergency personnel. Both staff and patients from the hospital on North Brother Island helped to form a human chain, pulling victims from the waters.

Seven people in all were indicted following the disaster: Captain Van Schaick (who lost an eye in the fire), two inspectors, the secretary, treasurer and commodore of the Knickerbocker Steamship Company. Only Van Schaick was convicted, of criminal negligence, for failing to maintain proper fire drills and extinguishers. He argued the reason he refused to beach the ship was to prevent the flames from spreading to buildings along the shore.

The judge sentenced him to 10 years imprisonment. In spite of appeals for clemency, then-President Theodore Roosevelt refused to pardon him. He was eventually released after serving only 3 ½ years by the Federal parole board under the Administration of President William H. Taft, who pardoned him in 1912. Van Schaick died 15 years later.

In a gross miscarriage of justice, the Knickerbocker Steamship Company was only given a relatively small fine, in spite of the fact evidence existed they falsified safety inspection records. The remains of the ship were recovered and made into a barge, which sank in 1911.

Though official estimates put the death toll of the disaster at 1,021, in actuality no one knows the true number, since this figure does not include family and close friends of the victims who later committed suicide out of grief. It also does not include those who survived but may have later died as a result of injuries sustained in the fire.

Little Germany, which was already in a state of decline, saw its demise rapidly accelerated as many of those who perished were among its leading citizens. In addition, the desire to find someone to blame caused sharp differences of opinion among the locals. Finally, disagreements as to how to properly disperse relief funds caused many family members and friends to turn on one another. Large numbers of denizens of Kleindeutschland eventually wound up living in Yorkville, Manhattan or on Long Island, NY. St. Mark’s Lutheran Evangelical Church is now the Max D. Raiskin Center of the Community Synagogue.

On January 26th, 2004 Adella Wotherspoon (née Liebenow), the last survivor of the General Slocum horror, died at the ripe old age of 100. She was only six months old at the time of the tragedy. Her two older sisters perished in the blaze.

In spite of the fact the death toll surrounding the burning of the PS General Slocum remains the second largest loss of life in New York City history (surpassed only by the events of September 11th, 2001), incredibly, few New Yorkers alive today seem to remember it. Probably even fewer Americans can recall it. Why?

Undoubtedly the events of the next 41 years (two world wars, with Germany the chief antagonist) are partly to blame for it. It was not popular to be German in this country for quite a long time. There’s also the fact that, unlike the Titanic, there were no super-rich among the victims of the General Slocum. Hey Steven Spielberg, how about a movie about this ship?

As a New Yorker and a European-American, I find those excuses totally unacceptable. The victims of the burning of the Slocum were Americans and New Yorkers, as well as Germans. They have every right to have their memory honored, and we as Americans (and especially New Yorkers) have a duty to honor it. To do anything less is a desecration of the dead.

Sitting here, staring at my calendar, I’m reminded of a somber event in the history of this city; when a piece of the tapestry of New York was cut from it, and “the Big Apple” was made lesser for it.

*Sicilians – native inhabitants of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.

Further reading:
1) O’Donnell, Edward: Ship Ablaze: The Tragedy of the Steamship ‘General Slocum’; New York, Broadway Books (2003).

June 8, 2010

Feast of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus

Sacro Cuore di Gesù in Napoli
The Feast of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus (Sacro Cuore di Gesù) is celebrated nineteen days after Pentecost Sunday in reparation for the indignities and sins committed against Our Lord. The devotion has its origins in the eleventh century, but only became widespread in 1690 after the death of its principal exponent St. Margaret Mary Alacoque. First celebrated in 1670, the Feast was eventually extended to the whole church by Pope Pius IX in 1856. The counter-revolutionary movements of the 18th and 19th centuries—such as the Royalists of the Vendée during the French Revolution and the Pontifical Zouaves during the so-called Italian Risorgimento, among others—were steadfastly loyal to the devotion. In celebration, I'm posting the Act of Consecration to the Sacred Heart by St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, The accompanying photo of the Sacred Heart was taken at the Chiesa di San Ferdinando in Piazza San Ferdinando during my 2007 pilgrimage to Napoli.
Act of Consecration to the Sacred Heart of Jesus 
O Sacred Heart of Jesus, to Thee I consecrate and offer up my person and my life, my actions, trials, and sufferings, that my entire being may henceforth only be employed in loving, honoring and glorifying Thee. This is my irrevocable will, to belong entirely to Thee, and to do all for Thy love, renouncing with my whole heart all that can displease Thee. I take Thee, O Sacred Heart, for the sole object of my love, the protection of my life, the pledge of my salvation, the remedy of my frailty and inconstancy, the reparation for all the defects of my life, and my secure refuge at the hour of my death. Be Thou, O Most Merciful Heart, my justification before God Thy Father, and screen me from His anger which I have so justly merited. I fear all from my own weakness and malice, but placing my entire confidence in Thee, O Heart of Love, I hope all from Thine infinite Goodness. Annihilate in me all that can displease or resist Thee. Imprint Thy pure love so deeply in my heart that I may never forget Thee or be separated from Thee. I beseech Thee, through Thine infinite Goodness, grant that my name be engraved upon Thy Heart, for in this I place all my happiness and all my glory, to live and to die as one of Thy devoted servants. Amen.

June 7, 2010

Book Review: Siren Land by Norman Douglas

By Giovanni di Napoli
"A seething witches' cauldron was South Italy; dark and passionate shapes emerge from the brew, clash their weapons or mutter a prayer, and again sink down." ~ Norman Douglas, Siren Land, Dodo Press, 2008, p. 191
While trolling the web for a new book to read I stumbled across an announcement for the coming release of Norman Douglas' Siren Land by Tauris Parke Paperbacks. First published in 1911, this latest manifestation is scheduled to be on bookshelves by August 3rd, 2010. I guess it's because of some legal or copyright issues that TPP would have to wait so long to publish a book that's already 99-years-old.

Considering the unsatisfactory quality of the 2008 edition published by Dodo Press I can understand the necessity for a revision. My copy is riddled with typos and misprints (many of the book's "e's" look like "c's"). Needless to say this was very distracting. Perhaps I'm nitpicking here, but in addition to the poor print job, Dodo didn't even have the courtesy of using an illustration depicting Southern Italy on the cover. Instead, they used a drawing of the equestrian statue of Bartolomeo Colleoni, the Condottiere from Bergamo, located in the Campo di san Zanipolo in Venice. Maybe I'm overreacting to this "insignificant" slight but if they had used one of the equestrian statues of the Bourbons in the Piazza del Plebiscito in Naples for a book about Venice, I’m sure the Venetians wouldn’t be pleased.

TPP's edition is subtitled "a celebration of life in Southern Italy," however Douglas' account reads more like a critique of Southern Italy that is often less than positive. It is replete with common prejudices typical of travelogues from that era. One is reminded of the famed "globe trotter" Burton Holmes and his book, Southern Italy, where he refers to Naples' scugnizzo (street urchins) as poor but happy street Arabs who speak a barbaric language: "The Neapolitans do not speak Italian, they speak Napoletano, a barbarous, scolding dialect that fearfully offends the true Italian ear." (Southern Italy by Burton Holmes, Chelsea House, 1998, pg. 56)

I have little reason to doubt that Mr. Douglas was telling the truth, as he saw it, about his experiences in Siren Land. I have plenty of my own unflattering stories about the places I visited (and I'm not just talking about Italy), but I do take umbrage with his opinions about the Neapolitan Bourbons and Southern Italian emigration. With his vast knowledge of history and folklore I find it a bit dubious that he would come to some of the conclusions that he did concerning Southern Italy's backwardness. Douglas clearly lays most of the region's problems at the feet of the Bourbons, completely playing down the fact that the Italy he was traveling through was brutally conquered 50 years earlier by Piedmont (1861) and still suffering from the aftermath.
"I rather think it was another kind of plague, the plague of a century of Bourbon-ism, which reduced these regions to a condition of misery whence they are now, thanks to a better government and to Argentina, slowly emerging. For ordinary pestilences and famines and earthquakes are mere amateurs in destruction whose effects are healed in briefest time: there may even be witnessed, after occasions when plough of affliction has violently disrupted the soil, a strange quickening in growth. But misrule strikes at the root of things, since humane strivings in a people, those of its elements that actively make for good, are so sporadic that their annihilation is wholly different from a haphazard calamity. And there was a sinister thoroughness in the Bourbon system which insured success." (Siren Land, p. 36)
Quick to admonish the Bourbons, Douglas completely ignores the "sinister thoroughness" of the House of Savoy following Italian unification. Nowhere in Siren Land is there mention of the Southern factories that were sacked or relocated up North. Not a word was said about the looting of Bourbon coffers to pay off Piedmont's debts to the bankers for financing their wars against Austria. Also absent is the fact that more people were killed in Southern Italy in the decade after unification, during the so-called "war against brigandage," than all the wars of the Risorgimento combined! Some estimates put the death toll as high as a million. Considering how ninety-nine percent of the plebiscite vote was in favor of unity it seems a little odd that the new Italian state needed 120,000 troops to suppress the pro-Bourbon rebellion.

Douglas continues:
"The effects of such a conscientious selection of badness must necessarily endure; it takes longer to rear up that which is humane than its opposite, seeing that there are a thousand wrongs for one right. 'There is no town and there is no country,' says a Neapolitan historian, 'which would not inevitably be impoverished by the loss of so many and such distinguished men.' It is this same elimination of progressive elements which has done so much harm to Spain and Russia, and which paved the way...for the fall of ancient Rome...Who shall estimate the vital strain of a century of terrorism?" (Siren Land, p. 36-37)
Douglas is of course alluding to the reprisals of the Bourbons against their political enemies—the liberal aristocracy and bourgeoisie—following their Restoration after Napoleon's downfall. In light of the atmosphere and accomplishments within The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies prior to the Risorgimento, his accusations appear spurious. The Bourbon reign was considered a Golden Age. Ferdinand IV established free schools in every town for both boys and girls, extensive roads were constructed and bridges repaired, academies and libraries were opened, observatories were built. Under Bourbon rule Naples was considered a cultural center that was a must-see on the celebrated “Grand Tour,” something well documented in literature and art throughout Europe. The so-called "Rascal King" also pardoned many people for their association with his enemies, something he did not have to do. Not everyone was granted a reprieve, and not everyone deserved one.

It is, at best, naive to believe that Ferdinand IV and Maria Carolina were not justified in retaliating against the subversive fifth column who, not once but twice, collaborated with the invading French and forced the Bourbon court to retreat to Sicily. These traitors were responsible for terrible bloodshed in their homeland. Tens of thousands of Southerners were killed fighting against Napoleon's forces and many more were murdered in retribution.

In addition to the suffering of their subjects, the Bourbons endured their own hardships as well. Let us not forget that the royal couple lost one of their children, six-year-old Prince Carlo Alberto, who died during the first tumultuous journey to Sicily. It should also be remembered that the Queen's sister, Marie Antoinette, was murdered during the Great Revolution, more accurately described as The Terror.

Douglas himself recalls the atrocities committed in Southern Italy by French General Charles Antoine Manhès, in Old Calabria (his other Southern Italian travelogue):
"The men who gave the French so much trouble were political brigands, allies of Bourbonism... At the end of a few months' campaign, every single brigand, and all their friends and relations, were wiped off the face of the earth—together with a very considerable number of innocent persons. The high roads were lined with decapitated bandits, the town walls decked with their heads; some villages had to be abandoned, on account of the stench; the Crati river was swollen with corpses, and its banks whitened with bones. God alone knows the cruelties which were enacted." (Old Calabria, Indy Publish, 2008, p. 208-209)
Yet somehow Douglas believes these atrocities and those later committed by Piedmont did not have adverse effects on Southern Italy. Strangely, he seems to prefer the rule of his country’s nemesis to that of the Bourbons. Lamenting Britain's role in supporting the Bourbons against Napoleon, Douglas writes:
"Those Englishmen, therefore, who complain of certain unpleasant characteristics of modern Neapolitans, might do well to remember that the Bourbons had been incapacitated from further mischief when their saviours from over the sea appeared on the scene and allowed them to continue for another half-century that rule of brigands, monks, lazzari, and other vermin which was responsible for the deplorable state of affairs." (Siren Land, p. 37)
Did Mr. Douglas forget Britain's complicity during Garibaldi's expedition to Sicily? They more than made up for their support of the Bourbons during the Napoleonic Wars with their anti-Bourbon meddling during the Risorgimento. It should be pointed out that the only reason why Garibaldi's red shirted adventurers—the famed meli (thousand)—reached the shores of Marsala on May 11, 1860 was because they were escorted by British warships, "protecting British interests." They would do so again when Garibaldi's forces crossed the Straights of Messina into Calabria. It is also true that a British admiral negotiated the surrender of Palermo. Apparently the English rulers found the Bourbons good enough to fight against Napoleon, who threatened Britain, but thought nothing of stabbing them in the back after their common enemy was removed. To be fair, there is no shortage of bloodshed in European history, but I wouldn't compare the blood on the Bourbon's hands with that of Napoleon or the British Empire.

I understand that politically motivated material will follow any conquest, but what truly irks me is the one-sidedness of the books currently available. I can't imagine there being a great demand for Siren Land today. The book is dated and is of little use for the modern traveler, but yet it's readily available, as is his Old Calabria, which was republished by TPP in April 2010. Yet, no matter how hard I try I still can't find affordable copies of Lord Harold Acton's The Bourbons of Naples or it's sequel The Last Bourbons of Naples (1825-1861). This is not to say that Siren Land is useless, it remains a historical record of that period's bias against Southern Italy and the Bourbons.

There is no disputing that Mr. Douglas was a highly articulate and eloquent writer. I certainly won't begrudge him this honor. However, it is precisely his literary mastery that makes this book so damaging. Much like the original "Godfather" movie, which single-handedly propelled mafia genre films into the limelight with it's success and popularity, Siren Land (as well as Old Calabria) was, in it's day, highly influential in perpetuating negative stereotypes and misinformation about Southern Italians. While I agree with the book being preserved for historical purposes, what we need today are translations of new books like Antonio Ciano’s I Savoia e il Massacro del Sud and Pino Aprile’s Terroni, that not only reveal the tragedy behind the Risorgimento, it’s aftermath and true legacy, but also expose the fallacies of books like Siren Land.

June 4, 2010

No shame in loss

Our Champions: Nazionale Calcio Regno Due Sicilie

Due Sicilie 0-2 Padania
Viva World Cup semifinals in Gozo, Malta

No one likes losing, especially in a derby. But there is no shame in losing to a quality side like Padania. The Northern Italians are after-all two-time defending Viva Word Cup champions (Campione del Mondo NF-Board) and strong favorites to win the tournament again this year. With their 2-0 victory over the Nazionale Calcio Regno Due Sicilie (representing Southern Italy) the Biancoverdi earned a spot in the finals against the winner of the Occitan-Kurdistan match. 

Newcomers to the competition, Due Sicilie performed admirably. The Giallorossi played well and created chances but they just couldn't get one past the keeper. The Southerners kept a clean sheet in the first half and conceded a goal in the 63rd minute against the flow of play. Padania doubled their advantage in the 88th minute, striking on a counter as Due Sicilie pushed forward to score an equalizer.

Winning the match may have been a little too much to hope for, but it's always nice to dream. It would have been a true "Cinderella Story" for us to win the competition. Due Sicilie will play the loser of the Occitan-Kurdistan match tomorrow (June 5, 2010) for third place.

The tournament provided wonderful experience for our team and is a great foundation to build on. The lads represented us well. I salute their efforts and proudly declare my allegiance to our true national team.

Screw Italy, Forza Due Sicilie!

Avanti Sud!

By New York Scugnizzo
Addendum (added June 6, 2010):

Due Sicilie lost their consolation match for third place against Occitan 2-0.

Padania defeated Kurdistan 1-0 in the finals, defending their title and winning the championship for an impressive third consecutive time.

The derby between North and South was such a success that there is talk of making the contest between Due Sicilie and Padania an annual event. I for one welcome such an initiative and look forward to the rematch. Forza Due Sicilie!

June 3, 2010

Forza Due Sicilie!

Photo courtesy of Nazionale di Calcio Regno Due Sicilie NF
As the world gears up for the FIFA World Cup in South Africa (June 11, 2010) another international football tournament, Viva World Cup, is already underway. Similar to the World Cup, the VWC looks to promote international football with teams representing nations unaffiliated with FIFA. According to organizers, “It’s about allowing peoples to exist through sport.” Clearly the event is not as prestigious or as star studded as the world's premier competition; however, it's definitely growing in popularity and stature. 

Launched in 2003 by the New Federation Board, an umbrella organization representing nations not recognized by FIFA, the inaugural tournament was held in Occitania in 2006, which saw the Sámi from Sweden lift the first trophy. Sápmi hosted in 2008 and Northern Italy in 2009 with Padania winning both competitions convincingly. Kurdistan are favorites to host the next installment in 2012.

Of course the "friendly competition" is not without its controversies. In 2005 the event was cancelled when Turkish occupied northern Cyprus hypocritically refused to allow breakaway hopefuls Kurdistan to participate. Also, NFB officials recently forced Padanian supporters to remove nationalistic flags and banners during a match, which seams to belie the nationalistic spirit of the tournament. Even the decision to name the championship trophy after South African terrorist, Nelson Mandela, must be questioned.

This year’s event is on the beautiful European island of Gozo, south of Sicily in the Maltese archipelago. Six teams representing nations not yet recognized—Gozo (Malta), Kurdistan (Iraq), Occitania (France), Provence (France), Padania (Italy) and The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (Italy)—are vying for the championship. 

As of this writing, The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies has qualified to face their Padanian rivals in the semi-finals on Friday, June 4th. The Southern Italian newcomers will have to overcome their northern nemesis to reach the final. This will be no easy task, the Padanians are two-time defending champions and rightly considered the tournament favorites. Frankly, as far as I'm concerned, the highly anticipated match against Padania is more important than winning the final itself. A victory against the northern powerhouse will go a long way in publicizing our peoples' cause (and, of course, give us important bragging rights). No matter what anybody else says, this is our true championship match. Besides, who really wants a trophy named after Nelson Mandela?

The final game will be held on June 5th, 2010.

Forza Due Sicilie!

Avanti Sud!

By New York Scugnizzo

June 1, 2010

Lecce Win Title and Promotion

Lecce are back in Serie A (Photo courtesy of U.S. Lecce SPA)


Forza Lecce!

After winning the second division title, U.S. Lecce have returned to top-flight calcio, joining fellow Southerners—Palermo, Napoli, Bari and Catania—in the 2010/11 Serie A campaign. With their 0-0 tie against Sassuolo on Sunday (May 30th) the Salentini secured their promotion, earning them the right to play against the peninsula's elite clubs. It has been a year since the squad from the Salento (in Puglia) has graced Serie A with their presence, and we welcome them back. Congratulations and good luck Lecce.

Elsewhere in the Cadetti

Calabrese sides, F.C. Crotone and Reggina Calcio, finished 8th and 12th respectively. Unfortunately, Salernitana Calcio from Campania were banished to Lega Pro for finishing last. 

Serie B side note

Frosinone Calcio finished 14th. I would like to point out that the province of Frosinone, located in the region of Lazio, was created in the 1920's by merging territories formally belonging to the Papal States (Littoria) and the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (Terra di Lavoro).

Other news

In the article, Mazzarri 'studying' title challenge, posted at Football Italia (an excellent website for English speaking fans of Italian football), Napoli coach, Walter Mazzarri is quoted as saying: “In the South, football is social revenge and these challenges make me enthusiastic.”

Avanti Sud!

Submitted by New York Scugnizzo