| 24 April 1777 — 15 November 1801 |
Eternal rest grant unto Her Majesty, O Lord and let perpetual light shine upon her. May her soul, and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.
| 24 April 1777 — 15 November 1801 |
Eternal rest grant unto Her Majesty, O Lord and let perpetual light shine upon her. May her soul, and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.
![]() |
| Photo courtesy of the Robert E. Howard Museum |
“Know, O prince, that between the years when the oceans drank Atlantis and the gleaming cities, and the years of the rise of the Sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of, when shining kingdoms lay spread across the world like blue mantles beneath the stars…” ~ The Nemedian Chronicles, Robert E. Howard
![]() |
| Robert E. Howard |
![]() |
| Limestone capital with four heads emerging from acanthus leaves, Apulia, probably Troia, carved about 1230 by Apulian sculptors working for the court of Frederick II Hohenstaufen (1194-1250) |
"In 863 a monk named Theodosius wrote of the grandeur of Palermo, describing it as 'full of citizens and strangers....Blended with the Sicilians the Greeks, the Lombards and the Jews, there are Arabs, Berbers, Persians, Tartars, Negroes, some wrapped in long robes and turbans...faces oval, square, or round, of every complexion and profile, beards and hair of every variety of color and cut.'" ~ Excerpt from the Metropolitan Museum of Art label for the thirteenth-century limestone capital (pictured)
Curious about my ancestry, I submitted my genetic material to 23andMe, hoping to learn something new about my biological makeup—and I did, just not in the way I expected.
Growing up hearing how we Southern Italians were part Greek, Jewish, Albanian, Berber, Arab, Black, Norman, Lombard, and every other group under the sun, almost nothing would have surprised me. So when my results came back with virtually none of these disparate ancestries, I was genuinely surprised.
As expected, I was over 90% European, with almost all of my ancestry originating from Southern Italy. I was impressed by how specific some of the regional matches were: Irpinia, the southern Gulf of Naples, the Campanian Valley, Mount Etna, and the Simeto Basin. Missing, however, were my roots from Messina (Gaggi, to be exact) and Lucania (Melfi). Given that I have my great-grandparents’ birth records from those towns, I expected them to appear.
Also unsurprising was that I was nearly 6% Albanian—my late aunt always claimed we were part Arbëreshë. It was the only group from that long list of peoples we were told we descended from by the self-appointed experts who always seemed to know more about us than we did.
![]() |
| Alternate view of capital |
I was happy to see an old painting of San Gennaro at the Figli di San Gennaro’s 100th Anniversary Gala, held Sunday afternoon at the El Caribe Country Club. I’d long wondered what became of it after the sale and subsequent destruction of Most Precious Blood Church’s rectory in Little Italy in 2019. Someone told me it was the work of Donatus Buongiorno (1865–1935), though I can’t confirm.
Only monsters play God.
It feels strangely fitting that Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein (2025) premiered in November, the Church’s month of remembrance for the Poor and Forgotten Souls in Purgatory—and yet, at the same time, it's hauntingly odd that it did not open in theaters on Halloween. Perhaps that was by design. Del Toro’s reimagining is not about jump-scares and shrieks, but a lament for the lost—a requiem for the restless dead. It belongs to November’s cold breath, not October’s masquerade.
Del Toro, a master of the macabre, conjures a world where beauty festers and sorrow gleams. Every shot feels carved from marble and shadow. His creature—stitched together from ambition, grief, and the daemonic impulse to play God—is less a monster than a soul suspended between heaven and hell. Watching him stumble through his creator's ruins is like gazing into Purgatory itself, where love and sin burn side by side in the same flame.
Visually and audibly, the film is a triumph. The performances are uniformly superb, and the sets are grand yet desolate. The costumes seem woven from mourning veils and funeral silks, each rich with texture and sorrowful grace. The score hums with dread and pity, echoing like a hymn from a ruined chapel. Few recent films have looked or sounded so hauntingly beautiful.
There's a striking symmetry—almost providential—in this return to Frankenstein’s origins. Though conceived in Geneva, Mary Shelley’s novel gives life to its eponymous protagonist—the true monster—in Naples (a detail not depicted in del Toro's film), an ancient city where the sacred and profane share the same breath, where death is no stranger, and the stones seem to whisper with ghosts. Shelley was deeply inspired by the city’s vitality and decay, its charnel houses and shrines, its proximity to both beauty and oblivion—and it's said Naples helped influence her vision of life torn from death.
Naples, no stranger to monsters, is even said to cradle the bones—and perhaps the restless spirit—of Vlad Tepes, the Prince of Wallachia, whose dark legend would one day cast the shadow of Dracula. It's a city where resurrection feels possible, even perilous. Del Toro’s gothic sensibility seems to draw from that same well—the city’s volcanic heartbeat, its mingling of death and divinity.
![]() |
| Reanimated across genres and generations, the creature refuses to die |
![]() |
| Photo by New York Scugnizzo |
“Be still, and know that I am God.” — Psalm 46:10The morning after returning from the woods, the city seemed louder than ever. The subway’s groan, the blaring horns, the reckless scooters careening down the sidewalk, the polyglot chatter of strangers—all of it crashed in at once, like a tide against the mind. After the silence of the forest, the noise felt invasive—almost painful. Yet soon enough, one remembers the rhythm again: coffee, train, work, conversation, distraction. The machinery of modern life resumes its ceaseless motion.
![]() |
| The Martyrdom of the Four Holy Crowned Martyrs attributed to Francesco Trevisani |
Præsta, quǽsumus, omnípotens Deus: ut, qui gloriósos Mártyres fortes in sua conessióne cognóvimus, pios apud te in nostra intercessióne sentiámus. Per Dóminum nostrum Jesum Christum. Fíllum tuum. qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitáte Spíritus Sancti, Deus, per ómnia sǽcula sæculórum.November 8th is the Feast of the Four Holy Crowned Martyrs—Claudius, Nicostratus, Simpronian, and Castorius—who lived in Rome during the reign of Emperor Diocletian (early 4th century). These Christian sculptors were commanded to carve idols of pagan gods but refused, boldly professing their faith in Christ. For their steadfastness, they were scourged and put to death.
| b. 14 August 1777 - d. 8 November 1830 |
Eternal rest grant unto His Majesty, O Lord and let perpetual light shine upon him. May his soul, and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen
A Nocturnal Meditation in the Passenger Seat
![]() |
| Immacolata Concezione by Bernardo Cavallino |
![]() |
| Meme depicting Trump as "God Emperor" |
![]() |
| A moment I'll never forget—meeting His Holiness Pope Leo XIV |
![]() |
| My friend John and I at the Vatican, waiting for our audience with the Pope |
Gianandrea de Antonellis’ review of Rafael Gambra’s Quello che chiamano Stato (What They Call the State) on altaterradilavoro.com is a model of intellectual engagement—lucid and deeply informed in tone and analysis alike. With scholarly precision, de Antonellis succeeds in conveying both the inner coherence of Gambra’s thought and the abiding relevance of his critique of modernity.
“Gambra was one of the first to understand the link that connected, on one hand, Marxism and idealism, and on the other, fascism and existentialism.”
From the outset, de Antonellis situates Gambra within the great ideological and philosophical struggles of the twentieth century, demonstrating how his thought bridges politics, theology, and metaphysics. Rather than treating him as a relic of reaction, the review presents Gambra as a thinker of surprising modernity—one who, without surrendering to modernism, understood its logic from within.
De Antonellis’s analysis of Gambra’s engagement with existentialism is particularly compelling. He notes that Gambra was not interested in creating a “Christian existentialism,” but rather in “utilizing certain elements of the existentialist reaction within the genuine conception of Christian philosophy.” This distinction, deftly unpacked, reveals Gambra’s originality and the subtlety of his philosophical approach.
The review also underscores Gambra’s engagement with figures such as Camus, Saint-Exupéry, Gustave Thibon, and Bertrand de Jouvenel—a constellation of authors rarely considered together, yet meaningfully connected through his synthesis of moral seriousness and political realism. De Antonellis highlights these influences with admirable clarity, drawing out the threads that link Catholic traditionalism to the broader intellectual currents of Europe.
Equally impressive is the treatment of Gambra’s Spanish traditionalism, particularly his defense of hispanidad as a spiritual and cultural category rather than a purely national one. De Antonellis rightly identifies in this notion the key to understanding Gambra’s vision of a civilization rooted in Christian order and historical continuity—an idea that feels all the more urgent in an age of disintegration and relativism.
Providing the backdrop to these pages, de Antonellis explains, is Spanish traditionalism itself, which toward the end of the book takes center stage. He points especially to four chapters: the acute reflections on patriotism and nationalism, where Gambra rejects the modern and romantic roots of the latter; the contrasting treatments of the “two federalisms”—the traditional form (more accurately called foralism) and the revolutionary, statist one that must never be confused with it; and finally, Gambra’s discussions of liberalism and his reconsideration of Spanish history. In all these reflections, traditionalism is embodied in Carlism and stands firm against the enemies of Hispanic Christendom.
The review closes on a note of moral and cultural clarity: Gambra’s critique of liberalism, nationalism, and statism, de Antonellis suggests, is not a rejection of modernity per se, but a call to recover a sane hierarchy of principles—a defense of the human person and the spiritual dimension of politics.
Beyond its careful exegesis, de Antonellis’s piece also serves as a reminder of the urgent need to make Gambra’s works available to a wider audience. Quello che chiamano Stato, like La Monarchia sociale e rappresentativa nel pensiero tradizionale (The Social and Representative Monarchy in Traditionalist Thought) before it, deserves to be translated into English. Without such translations, Anglophone readers remain deprived of one of the twentieth century’s most insightful and penetrating traditionalist philosophers—a thinker whose critiques of rationalism, secularism, and the modern state speak directly to our own cultural and political crises.
“The timeliness of Gambra’s writing is striking—it triumphantly withstands the passage of time.”
In sum, Gianandrea de Antonellis’s review is more than a summary; it is a learned meditation on the continuity of Christian civilization and the intellectual courage of one of its most faithful defenders. Thoughtful, well-structured, and spiritually alive, it honors both Gambra’s work and the tradition he sought to renew.
~ By Giovanni di Napoli, November 5th, Feast of the Holy Relics
Rafael Gambra, Quello che chiamano Stato, prefazione di Francesco Elias de Tejada, Premessa di Miguel Ayuso, Solfanelli, Chieti, 2025, pagg. 192, € 14,00

Sant'Uberto di Liège, ora pro nobis
Great St. Hubert, you were passionate about the hunt, but when touched by Divine Grace, you laid down your bow and took up the collar of priesthood. Known for your miracles and the conversion of many, you led countless souls to worship and glorify Our Lord. Moved by your example, I implore your help: obtain for me the Grace to follow in your footsteps and become a passionate disciple of Christ. Amen.
A few hours away was all it took to remember how quiet the world can be when left to itself. Upstate, beyond the reach of sirens and the din of digital devices, the woods were already clothed in autumn—scarlet, gold, and rust whispering beneath a pale sun. The air was sharp and honest, filled with the scent of damp earth and fallen leaves, and the silence was not emptiness but presence.
Here, without the noise and the endless commentary of modern life, the soul begins to breathe again. One can think—not in the shallow, distracted way of the city, but in that older sense of recollection, of turning inward. The rhythm of the woods restores a proper order, where all things, seen aright, lead back to God. Watching the leaves fall, I was reminded that every created thing speaks of its Maker, and that rest, rightly understood, is not escape but return—to simplicity, to gratitude, to truth.
Each year, the Feast of Sant’Uberto di Liège—the hunter turned saint—arrives with the first days of November, the month of the Holy Souls. I think then of my father, who was an avid hunter. It is a time when the world itself seems to mourn, and we are called to remember those who have gone before us.
Once a nobleman chasing stags through the Ardennes, Hubert was struck by a vision of the Crucifix between a deer’s antlers, and from that encounter his life was changed. The hunt became a prayer.
I’ve long adopted him—along with Sant'Eustachio—as patron for my father, who spent his happiest hours in the woods. For him, hunting was never mere sport, but communion: with creation, with silence, with the God who speaks through both.
The forest becomes a chapel, the stillness a litany. Every rustle in the underbrush recalls the sacred order of things—man as steward, not master, of creation. In that quiet, my father, and by extension all my ancestors, feel near again. And as I pray for their repose, Sant’Uberto’s lesson resounds: that all pursuits, rightly ordered, lead us back to the Cross—and through it, to the peace of eternity. Evviva Sant'Uberto!
~ By Giovanni di Napoli, November 4th, Feast of San Carlo Borromeo
While visiting the Chiesa di Santa Lucia del Gonfalone in Rome, I wandered through its interior and paused in the many small side chapels—each a quiet world of its own. The walls were lined with paintings whose authorship is unknown to me: tender Madonnas, stoic martyrs, and scenes of sorrow and redemption rendered in vibrant pigments. In one chapel stood a black crucifix; in another, a white statue of Santa Lucia, serene and luminous against the dim light. At the high altar, an extraordinary icon of the Madonna and Child seemed almost to glow from within. Though centuries old, all these works still breathe with devotion, their beauty softened but not diminished by age.
Il Regno is not a formal membership organization. We are a circle of like-minded individuals based in Brooklyn, New York, who volunteer our time and efforts to preserve and promote our Duosiciliano (Southern Italian) heritage, culture and faith. The title of our journal is an allusion to the former Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, which was often simply referred to as il Regno, or the Kingdom. We are Catholic, Monarchist and support the Neobourbon cause. Viva Cristo Re!
Contact: ilregno2s@yahoo.com